See something you'd like to change or add, but you've never edited an open encyclopædia before? This overview was written to help absolute beginners get started.

User talk:ListenerX

From A Storehouse of Knowledge
Jump to: navigation, search

G'day ListenerX, and welcome to aSK. We are glad to have you contribute. For more information about aSK, see our About statement. Please see the rules and regulations as soon as you can.
The following links are also useful.

Thanks, I wasn't sure if that was over the line. Neveruse513 16:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Contents

NOMA edit

Whether my NOMA edit should have been in the Article or not is open to Debate. I do Not think that cutting it from the Article without comment on the talk page, and then making it look like an Unsigned Comment was Proper.--Tolerance 17:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

"It should be noted, however, that scientific evidence contradicting beliefs in which one has faith may not be dismissed in this way."

I'm going to shout the word "exactly" at you now. Hold still.

Exactly! New3.pngPink(Inertia presides over burnt modernist strides) 22:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Also!

What's that thing in your signature supposed to be? New3.pngPink(Inertia presides over burnt modernist strides) 02:56, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Look it up here. ListenerXTalkerX 03:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Do you mean this? I'm not sure it's displaying correctly on my screen. :( New3.pngPink(Inertia presides over burnt modernist strides) 03:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes. ListenerXTalkerX 03:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Logo image

Hi. Just to say that I've appropriated your logo submission for a Bible concordance linking template at {{concordance}}. I think it looks great, so thanks for uploading it.--CPalmer 12:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Glad to see some use could be found for it. ListenerXTalkerX 16:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Fellow member of the Nag of Four

Wow, that takes me back. ^_^ New3.pngPink(Inertia presides over burnt modernist strides) 06:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations

Congratulations for editing so well as it must be the middle of the night in Minnesota. Thanks also for improving my articles. Proxima Centauri 08:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Contacts

Hi Listener. Did that group you were going to contact about an experiment ever come back to you?--Bob M 16:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

I have not been contacted, but the notice went up about the same time that RationalWiki went down. o ListenerXTalkerX 16:39, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Zen Buddhism

<sigh> It was a joke. ANyway, I'm starting a real article on this now. Jim 01:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Evolution

I am unhappy that you saw fit to revert my edits. They are all reasonable and accurate and remedy misleading aspects of the article as it stands. I am surprised that Philip seems bent on misrepresenting the theory of evolution. I had understood that he possessed a measure of integrity that is not shared by many creationists. However, I have been disappointed recently. --Horace 22:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

There is no point in edit-warring on the page. As I promised in the edit comment of the reversion, I have now made an attempt to reintroduce the changes in a more palatable form. o ListenerXTalkerX 22:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

No parody or vandalism?

In light of this, you should do something about this. BradleyF (LowKey) 23:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

You're saying it constitutes parody? I, for one, wasn't sure. How can you be so certain? --Horace 23:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
I was unsure as well, hence my tagging of the edit. Nevertheless, LowKey, I am willing to defend it; if anyone wishes to submit that the argument in my subsection was invalid, but the argument in the "Beauty" subsection is valid, the matter can be taken up on the talk-page. o ListenerXTalkerX 02:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Experiment participation

Please participate in my experiment. Thanks! Sterile 17:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

You would not want me to participate in your experiment. o ListenerXTalkerX 17:30, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Listener: Don't suppose you got any response from friends at the coven who you were going to try to persuade to participate in something similar at RW?--Bob M 18:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
They are not my friends; I just happened to be a member there at the witching forum, so I posted the notice. See my post at the Saloon Bar. o ListenerXTalkerX 18:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
visitor navigation
contributor navigation
monitoring
Toolbox